Blogger stands trial
I've always found it fascinating how different media report a story. Different mediums present messages differently - the news on television often brings a story home by showing its events; radio lets you hear the participants, and The story you'll get on global TV, compared with the story on the CBC always interested me. I grew up in a house where the newspaper was always there to be read, and get most of my news now on the internet.
I'm convinced that blogs are changing traditional media. During the bombings in Lebanon this summer, various blogs reported the events as they were happening - real time journalism from the perspective of people right there on the ground.
My future brother-in-law pointed out a story to me the other night that I'll be following closely.
It's a blogger named Charles LeBlanc who was charged with obstructing justice at a protest in Saint John, New Brunswick at a protest last June. He was not participating in the demonstration, only standing next to other media. He's challenging the traditional definition of media, saying that as a blogger, he too is media. He reports the news as he sees it and is evidently a fixture around the province, reporting stories.
The other twist, is that his perspective is not that of your everyday journalist with degrees and a high position in society. LeBlanc is on social assistance and often eats at a soup kitchen to get by- and, while I gather journalism jobs often don't pay well, his perspective is likely different from . His camera was donated, and he writes the stories himself.
So here's the question: Are bloggers legitimate media who should be afforded the same status as regular media?